![]() ![]() Requiring that a prosecutor prove a defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is a fundamental concept in American law that is intended to ensure that only people who are truly guilty are convicted of committing a crime. That is because, in such cases, the court is not in a position to weigh the evidence in its totality and must make a necessarily interim assessment.Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof in the American legal system. In civil cases where there is a preliminary issue, for example as to jurisdiction, the burden is sometimes expressed as “a good arguable case” or “much the better of the argument”. ![]() For example, in criminal cases in which a defence of insanity is raised, it is for the defence to establish it on a balance of probabilities, ie to the civil standard. In certain circumstances, the burden will fall on or shift to the other party. This is unofficially described as the 51% test. ![]() In civil cases, the burden of proof is on the claimant, and the standard required of them is that they prove the case against the defendant “on a balance of probabilities”. This is unofficially described as the 99% test. For the benefit of the jury in the Crown Court, this is usually expressed as requiring them to be “satisfied so that you are sure” of the defendant’s guilt. In criminal cases, the burden of proof is on the prosecution, and the standard required of them is that they prove the case against the defendant “beyond reasonable doubt”. The burden of proof, sometimes known as the “onus”, is the requirement to satisfy that standard. The standard of proof is the degree to which a party must prove its case to succeed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |